From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 7 12:13:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BA41065676 for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 12:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofdpb-freebsd-ports-bugs@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CD78FC1D for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 12:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofdpb-freebsd-ports-bugs@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KyPlu-0003vU-Kc for freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 11:45:02 +0000 Received: from 91-64-171-198-dynip.superkabel.de ([91.64.171.198]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 11:45:02 +0000 Received: from ino-news by 91-64-171-198-dynip.superkabel.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 11:45:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org From: clemens fischer Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 12:38:30 +0100 Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: <200810302210.m9UMA3hf089383@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 91-64-171-198-dynip.superkabel.de X-Archive: encrypt=none User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/8.0-CURRENT (i386)) Sender: news Subject: Re: ports/127728: [patch] ports/games/freebsd-games doesn't build, ?and larn(6) segfaults! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 12:13:04 -0000 On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:10:03 GMT clemens fischer wrote: > My biggest problem was reading and understanding the code, so I had to > clean it up a little. Unfortunately, it makes the diff larger than it > needs to be. It is attached. Should somebody ever get around to fixing this port, please get back to me. I have a newer patch after finding typos etc. -c