From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Dec 23 13:58: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mail.numachi.com (numachi.numachi.com [198.175.254.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F71014C27 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 13:58:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from reichert@numachi.com) Received: (qmail 20182 invoked by uid 1001); 23 Dec 1999 21:57:56 -0000 Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 16:57:56 -0500 From: Brian Reichert To: "Robert J. Adams" Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: newfs Message-ID: <19991223165755.C14381@numachi.com> References: <006f01bf4d92$26f64160$3102fbd1@siscom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre4i In-Reply-To: <006f01bf4d92$26f64160$3102fbd1@siscom.net>; from radams@siscom.net on Thu, Dec 23, 1999 at 05:04:01PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Dec 23, 1999 at 05:04:01PM -0500, Robert J. Adams wrote: > Hello all, > > We are building a new INN cnfs box using 50gig barracudas.. I was wondering > what the best newfs options would be. Since this is going to have one large > file per drive, I assume I don't need many inodes? I was thinking something > along the lines of: > > newfs -b 65536 -m 0 -f 32768 /dev/blah > > Does the above look ok? Will it have any performance issues since it will be > "optimized" for space and not time? Poke at the mailing archives (for -hackers) for posting from Joe Greco (?) on this very topic... > -j > > --- > Robert J. Adams radams@siscom.net http://www.siscom.net > Looking to outsource news? http://www.newshosting.com > SISCOM Network Administration - President, SISCOM Inc. > Phone: 937-222-8150 FAX: 937-222-8153 -- Brian 'you Bastard' Reichert reichert@numachi.com 37 Crystal Ave. #303 Daytime number: (781) 899-7484 x704 Derry NH 03038-1713 USA Intel architecture: the left-hand path To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message