From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 2 09:14:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D6516A4CE; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 09:14:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta7.adelphia.net (mta7.adelphia.net [68.168.78.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043F443FDD; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 09:14:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from potentialtech.com ([68.68.113.33]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20031202170201.UHCF4878.mta13.adelphia.net@potentialtech.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:02:01 -0500 Message-ID: <3FCCC589.8040700@potentialtech.com> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 12:02:01 -0500 From: Bill Moran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20031005 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Rhodes References: <3FCBB04F.7070204@potentialtech.com> <20031201221825.GB10158@jenny.daemon.li> <20031202053708.GC71732@unixpages.org> <20031202090021.GA269@jenny.daemon.li> <20031202112217.23a48871.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20031202162745.GE71732@unixpages.org> <20031202114420.00233193.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20031202114420.00233193.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Proposed addition to the mail section of the handbook X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 17:14:25 -0000 Tom Rhodes wrote: > On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 17:27:45 +0100 > Christian Brueffer wrote: > >>On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 11:22:17AM -0500, Tom Rhodes wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:00:21 +0100 >>>Josef El-Rayes wrote: >>> >>>>Christian Brueffer wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 11:18:25PM +0100, Josef El-Rayes wrote: >>>> >>>>>>line 72: it is "manpage" not "man page". >>>> >>>>>Actually it is 'manual page'. >>>> >>>>i prefer too, the expression 'manual page', but as >>>>bill used the short form, i just wanted to point out >>>>that o'reilly writes it 'manpage' and not 'man page'. >>>> >>>>(http://www.oreilly.com/oreilly/author/stylesheet.html#M). >>> >>>It always depends on who you talk to too. Some people say man >>>page, some use manual page, some use manpage. Trust me, this >>>is a bikeshed you don't want to step into... :) >> >>Of course. What I meant to say was 'manual page is what we usually use >>for our documentation' :-) > > I like manual page as well. This was probably keramida's fault now > that I think about it... :P This looks authoritative: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/fdp-primer/writing-style-word-list.html ... and I'd like my bikeshed pink, to match my Huffy ;) -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com