Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 10:02:40 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251510] net-mgmt/bandwhich process <UNKNOWN> Message-ID: <bug-251510-7788-LdfE2wx2fq@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-251510-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-251510-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251510 --- Comment #3 from Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com> --- It continues to show a single <UNKNOWN> whilst (for example) running Firefo= x; and before, during and after a start of Thunderbird. Apparently a single process with a rising number of connections, as Thunderbird makes its connections.=20 I start Falkon, the number of connections for <UNKNOWN> rises; I quit Falko= n, the number drops. And so on.=20 bandwhich aside for a moment, <https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2020-November/077655.h= tml> there's a suggestion to use fstat.=20 Elsewhere recently I read stronger discouragement from relying upon lsof on FreeBSD. Not bookmarked (sorry) but if I do find the technical discussion again, I'll add something here. Note to self: not found in #freebsd on IRC.= =20 In the meantime:=20 <https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=3Dlsof#BUGS>; I see <https://github.com/imsnif/bandwhich/issues/149#issuecomment-62982815= 0> but whether fstat is feasible for bandwhich, I have no idea. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-251510-7788-LdfE2wx2fq>