From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 10 23:22:17 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B620416A419 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 23:22:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from morganw@chemikals.org) Received: from tiamat.relinetworks.com (tiamat.relinetworks.com [204.214.92.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5523B13C481 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 23:22:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from morganw@chemikals.org) Received: from volatile.chemikals.org (root@r74-193-170-223.bssrcmta01.bscyla.by.dh.suddenlink.net [74.193.170.223] (may be forged)) by tiamat.relinetworks.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAAMirnQ011041; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 17:44:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from morganw@chemikals.org) Received: from localhost (morganw@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by volatile.chemikals.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAAMimVg003030; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:44:53 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from morganw@chemikals.org) Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:44:47 -0600 (CST) From: Wes Morgan To: Peter Schuller In-Reply-To: <200711102306.41449.peter.schuller@infidyne.com> Message-ID: References: <200711102306.41449.peter.schuller@infidyne.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: faad/faac and drm X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 23:22:17 -0000 On Sat, 10 Nov 2007, Peter Schuller wrote: > Hello, > > multimedia@freebsd.org is MAINTAINER of faad/faac, hence I am asking here. > > audio/faac produces .aac files that are not playable with mplayer, nor even > decodeable with faad. Disabling drm in faac makes it playable with mplayer, > but still not decodeable with faad unless drm is disabled in faad too. > > Both ports have explicitly enabled drm by a CONFIGURE_ARGS addition. > > With DRM they won't play/decode with: > > Error: Bitstream value not allowed by specification > > Is there some reason why the ports have drm enabled? Given that it's not > tunable, would it not be a better default to not have it enabled? Under what > circumstances does anyone really want the drm stuff anyway? I think I saw a thread earlier this week about faac 1.26 being broken. Try downgrading to 1.25.