From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Aug 12 12:46:47 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pau-amma.whistle.com (pau-amma.whistle.com [207.76.205.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A2F1585F for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:46:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dhw@whistle.com) Received: (from dhw@localhost) by pau-amma.whistle.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id MAA98218; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:46:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:46:47 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill <dhw@whistle.com> Message-Id: <199908121946.MAA98218@pau-amma.whistle.com> To: imp@village.org, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Kludge-o-round for 1 3.2 STABLE NFS problem In-Reply-To: <199908121933.NAA05527@harmony.village.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 13:33:41 -0600 >From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> >We were having all kinds of problems using NFS on locally mounted file >systems (that is, the client and server were on the same machine)..... I encountered similar symptoms back when I started here, at around 2.2.6-R. My circumvention was to hack the amd maps in such a way that amd would recognize when the client & server had the same name: * If not, do the usual NFS stuff; * If so, instead of providing the illusion of an NFS mount, provide the illusion of a symlink. This is what allowed me to get anything at all done for the past several months.... I *thought* I had sent a note to one of the freebsd lists about it, including some of the stuff in the amd maps. If it appears to be of use, I'm certainly willing to share. (The note to the effect that "a weird imagination is most useful to gain full advantage of some of all the [amd] features" is well-advised.) And of course, I freely admit that the approach merely masks the problem. Cheers, david -- David Wolfskill dhw@whistle.com UNIX System Administrator voice: (650) 577-7158 pager: (888) 347-0197 FAX: (650) 372-5915 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message