From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 12 16:00:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E90106566C for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:00:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543078FC17 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:00:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8CG0Lvq070026 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:00:21 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o8CG0KEH070006; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:00:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:00:20 GMT Message-Id: <201009121600.o8CG0KEH070006@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org From: Andriy Gapon Cc: Subject: Re: i386/135447: [i386] [request] Intel Core i7 and Nehalem-EP new features not supported X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Andriy Gapon List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:00:21 -0000 The following reply was made to PR i386/135447; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andriy Gapon To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, dk@garant.ru Cc: Bruce Cran Subject: Re: i386/135447: [i386] [request] Intel Core i7 and Nehalem-EP new features not supported Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 18:52:14 +0300 First of all, the PR was created improperly - sysctl -a output is in "Fix" section for some reason. Please don't do that in the future. Second, it's impossible to tell if "C2 and C3 states should probably be available" unless we see acpidump -dt output and dmesg with ACPI debugging enabled (ACPI_PROCESSOR x ACPI_DB_INFO): http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/acpi-debug.html P.S. That is, generally we expect to see C2 and C3 levels, but not universally. BIOS or BIOS configuration, motherboard peculiarities and OS supported features are among the thing that affect C2+ availability. -- Andriy Gapon