From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Thu Jan 16 02:14:58 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8358F22568A for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 02:14:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-f42.google.com (mail-io1-f42.google.com [209.85.166.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47ynp95DTbz4K0P; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 02:14:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-f42.google.com with SMTP id k24so20036318ioc.4; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 18:14:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UKxAVOefzOVe+8xHNI3TSyIS26z6BbwuLZoUQwi6vVc=; b=Kwt+PO4jYMYx0YwMGLxO9lurl2vkzCT3ANF6DMiHIpNBEGO3BTEsDpENMGR8yNxboT o5t/166mliwf233iaTleOYlbUJzQxqH5i8Bk52xbipjhLcothMazMMPL0X8hB3PeGJ0z SokOIdZrOGC6xboCypjRf1h3dtfSOcFEb8VkS08/DUrUJruA+yeFCHIlEM9SJ2zgkypd 8QHQ7aLSr6fvbqVkl/0JkzT+jnFJtEWCaVfVgcey89Pl+RaZn2IW33I6PihQt7C4oyXz 1Pr/vDjiXsmCr3a8V84GPuNaKUBswfUimtMeFpWsfvDO16/ZinfxLmVQn4ANCvy5Od6j pHIw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXe1NGfUMYV0Uk1JuiY8k99dZ5WswsD52BUnFY0NS9RZ9LUyRhb qJiez/LIjzF3VtkzCVKUcffAr3GEWM1RrWgYWjI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxyQUWwKOB2xAJwftwzpktp/dDc3fBpJ65fpfOGd7l7nYwnN+jC4gacDTSrDaC3JjupWOUYZzN18qcaAO4e1bc= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:aa12:: with SMTP id s18mr23010822ioe.182.1579140896289; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 18:14:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <202001150747.00F7lqiG071097@repo.freebsd.org> <6925a470-ccbe-1446-e55e-f0aa8b6e6387@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: From: Ed Maste Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:14:44 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r356758 - in head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall: . scripts To: Warner Losh Cc: Pedro Giffuni , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47ynp95DTbz4K0P X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carpeddiem@gmail.com designates 209.85.166.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carpeddiem@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.10 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[42.166.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-2.10)[ip: (-5.55), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.08), asn: 15169(-1.83), country: US(-0.05)]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[42.166.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 02:14:58 -0000 On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 17:55, Warner Losh wrote: > > It's not i386 vs amd64 that's the issue. It's the total amount of RAM. ZFS > is perfectly happy with i386 installs with enough RAM. We'd catch most > sub-optimal cases if we'd offer it only for systems with > ~2-4GB. Very good point, defaulting to UFS for <4GB and ZFS for >=4GB sounds decent to me.