From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 26 9:57:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from happy.checkpoint.com (happy.checkpoint.com [199.203.156.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2815537B802 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 09:57:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mellon@pobox.com) Received: (from mellon@localhost) by happy.checkpoint.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA02057; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 19:55:19 GMT (envelope-from mellon@pobox.com) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 19:55:19 +0000 From: Anatoly Vorobey To: Doug Barton Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: commit MAKE_SHELL? Message-ID: <20000426195519.A2022@happy.checkpoint.com> References: ; <20000425170951.A29390@happy.checkpoint.com> <200004251528.RAA29727@m2.dynas.se> <20000425232447.A32567@happy.checkpoint.com> <390685E7.986C2EBA@gorean.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <390685E7.986C2EBA@gorean.org>; from Doug@gorean.org on Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 11:00:07PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 11:00:07PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Anatoly Vorobey wrote: > > > Well, *should* we have a built-in "test"? I gather the original ash didn't > > have it due to the KIS principle. But if it speeds things up considerably, > > it's not much of a bloat, is it? I'd volunteer to write it. > > Unfortunately, the only way to tell for sure would be to do a couple > make worlds with the current sh, then do some with super-sh with the > built in 'test'. You are right. I will do it, and report the results. -- Anatoly Vorobey, mellon@pobox.com http://pobox.com/~mellon/ "Angels can fly because they take themselves lightly" - G.K.Chesterton To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message