From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Apr 9 9:21:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ringworld.nanolink.com (ringworld.nanolink.com [195.24.48.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E9FAA37B42C for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 09:21:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roam@orbitel.bg) Received: (qmail 3747 invoked by uid 1000); 9 Apr 2001 16:20:29 -0000 Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 19:20:29 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev To: Ade Lovett Cc: The Hermit Hacker , Maxim Sobolev , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Imagemagick doesn't know about freetype2 ... Message-ID: <20010409192029.D2827@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: Ade Lovett , The Hermit Hacker , Maxim Sobolev , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG References: <3AD1DA69.41F7B257@FreeBSD.org> <20010409111813.A20461@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010409111813.A20461@FreeBSD.org>; from ade@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 11:18:13AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 11:18:13AM -0500, Ade Lovett wrote: > On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 01:11:50PM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > Okay, I might be missing something, but why is shipping freetype2 with > > XFree86 a bad thing? > > It isn't, if it's done right (full install), and the print/freetype2 > port is also modified to install into the exact same place. full install.. with the same compiler flags.. with the same run-time dependencies.. sounds like quite a lot of work no one would want to even try tackling (quite understandably..) G'luck, Peter -- This sentence no verb. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message