Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 19:28:19 -0500 From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>, Andrew Pantyukhin <infofarmer@gmail.com>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Number of maintainers vs. number of ports Message-ID: <20060530002819.GB18969@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <447952AF.9060508@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <cb5206420605220417o5a5d8667l648f42644f39d4e4@mail.gmail.com> <cb5206420605220528k1be0bc03t1c74c6c8e08f35b4@mail.gmail.com> <20060523012528.GA8161@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060527205101.H1114@ganymede.hub.org> <447952AF.9060508@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 08:35:11AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Otherwise, the convention is that the port name -- eg databases/phpmyadmin > should always be quoted in the PR subject line. Then you can go and look it > up using portsmon: > > http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=databases&portname=phpmyadmin portsmon does a great deal of work to not rely solely on the PR subject lines, which are missing the category/portname somewhere around 30% of the time. (It would be nice if people would put this in, so that GNATS can also be used to search, but they don't.) Like Edwin's auto-assigner, it gets somewhere around 95%+ correct assignments. When I'm not travelling, I try to catch the other few percent once a day. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060530002819.GB18969>