From nobody Fri Oct 17 06:06:13 2025 X-Original-To: pkgbase@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4cnvTV3HGnz6ChLx; Fri, 17 Oct 2025 06:06:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivy@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R13" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4cnvTV2kjbz3VP5; Fri, 17 Oct 2025 06:06:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivy@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1760681182; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jjzGPVTnyBKYRQRUVoiBzfZd30y9KAUeW8dcnikg4NY=; b=LRQfCI4Wgt6PAGB72/6UgccgeW31KBwXiBp4NSfz2tZwnd7YOWTlbOOawvfmggVQjwDFqm Ajy6gVLejHhOjEGe/75RnoJI2Hlm+0RaPRIh/dyE7rWY3/ancrURXIJF4Y4Yxs5aNhK+ei 1CvgG0bjk4dROsaX8jucOTDqkXkDC6yjap5F1nvY9bXqvVHFS7AnOWTOB/1yIbsqIMsDib 8rRcwOxkRD8EWslDHTycfQUugjZGOvJJ4aOrQ4z62uDy97I+30t9+/6iSHNFWMLp3FPuFN njCAB8qlR2CGYZPwjQHVh6lV6+sLhXVPqZ1GnicctiGad7JbnPlf4xIV8q8s6g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1760681182; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jjzGPVTnyBKYRQRUVoiBzfZd30y9KAUeW8dcnikg4NY=; b=betOdcHOC3Z46r+XYBT64ELaclOyRD+ge8eDuP2I69UUlRMhjO5wUYh/uL4NJFwDc8ksMF CkPQoIh8zzwB6iyTWCxRAOKPHt0sMVICcooL957VCRilnp+a1ZUNJvQO8A1ULJCkzICEqc 6dkRDnKEDmnTdwYNSxSnwqS85pdTBAB3aRFDG00+nyyQetm5h1+8i4OrAGvfEaOmHKFu9R M50hUu78uIsUt41EkTdA9pKXM1f/RjxwsFckCBZdnRcmYUgS2i4KUtMyzN0lNh10f/iS8z kirTRSMFSIpwIV637BCbvHenM4T/fXIPfqbgdA3/7O5gARBNBG5GsgQnuAsBhg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1760681182; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=J6eqXj7W4eHqG+qxbH8t49VmzI9MSPftKMOCXQSq5Uwvj5dLgLAV0cEn0AFplyrWHIfzq1 ObZ4OqIc7OLxnidCl1oPm9RM+GXlXECfzYAi078faYlUr+q7+l9d6xBG/zwc7bIxzcqguf g4ehltVHQXBp6YQgu0xNrovnhoTiC2pAJFuqS3ZojCNTT4ZCTo03kkOjNpBuRcPbdqDP+H OqIFqPXKijZGmO/aLJ0MlSvbmvlVKDxvbcoweciiJc++QRxeVeTeWBM5CE9SC0Zn/774VP wTyvofwPbmlOXu274q1ksmyxRLQj4navWhw+wneggGUqpcH0VEr4HlTlEBE0Bg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from amaryllis.le-fay.org (amaryllis.le-fay.org [IPv6:2a00:1098:6b:400::9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: ivy/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4cnvTT5rMFz5Mt; Fri, 17 Oct 2025 06:06:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivy@freebsd.org) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 07:06:13 +0100 From: Lexi Winter To: Chris Cc: Ronald Klop , current@freebsd.org, pkgbase@freebsd.org Subject: Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Chris , Ronald Klop , current@freebsd.org, pkgbase@freebsd.org References: <324231230.147694.1760527890049@localhost> <1dab51ef73837d98d5b5c36ef1e39118@bsdforge.com> List-Id: Packaging the FreeBSD base system List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkgbase List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkgbase@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="z8A0Ujibr1GpqVY4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1dab51ef73837d98d5b5c36ef1e39118@bsdforge.com> --z8A0Ujibr1GpqVY4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Chris wrote in <1dab51ef73837d98d5b5c36ef1e39118@bsdforge.com>: > On 2025-10-15 05:16, Lexi Winter wrote: > > so if dhclient use in jails is widespread, we should probably > > add it to minimal-jail. > IMHO isn't the HOST responsible for routing? Doesn't that make dhclient > and friends somewhat unusual (not average jail(8) setup?). no, in VNET jails the jail does routing itself, including IP address assignment. while i personally prefer to do this statically, i believe it's fairly common to use DHCP (for IPv4) or SLAAC (for IPv6) to handle this automatically, especially in mass-hosting setups. since dhclient is fairly small (150kB) and DHCP is something people typically expect to "just work", i am leaning on the side of putting this into minimal-jail unless anyone has a strong objection. --z8A0Ujibr1GpqVY4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQSyjTg96lp3RifySyn1nT63mIK/YAUCaPHc1QAKCRD1nT63mIK/ YBVEAP0QoFw8WEicvpaaDVc5S2qQxK9r4bJTnmfElNo2rAdwKgD8Ctftytn2y+Kg IvTkDXo5q6O4DnQkUKyYuZ5/WVBzlw0= =vH5v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --z8A0Ujibr1GpqVY4--