From owner-freebsd-isp  Mon Aug  4 12:46:01 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA22717
          for isp-outgoing; Mon, 4 Aug 1997 12:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from adsight.com (adsight.com [207.86.2.34])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA22712
          for <isp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 4 Aug 1997 12:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (webadmin@localhost) by adsight.com (8.8.6/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA26893; Mon, 4 Aug 1997 15:44:21 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 1997 15:44:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Magee <webadmin@adsight.com>
To: Steven Ames <steve@news.cioe.com>
cc: isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: front page .. which emulation?
In-Reply-To: <199708041750.MAA29479@news.cioe.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970804154130.26882A-100000@adsight.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> Since there is no FreeBSD binary of the front page extensions (something
> that I really think Microsoft should remedy...), which version do I use?
> 
> I tried the BSDI ones (thinking that freebsd had binary compatibility
> with BSDI), but they didn't go... should I try the linux ones next?
> 
> BTW, 'didn't go' translates to: Exec format error. Wrong Architecture.
> 
> I've scanned microsoft and rtr's sites.
> 
> 						-STeve

I'm using the BSDI extensions on FreeBSD 2.2 Stable, but also used
them back on version 2.1.5 which I think was the earliest version
that supported the bsdi format.

- Sam