From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 9 02:39:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB9916A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 02:39:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-m27.mx.aol.com (imo-m27.mx.aol.com [64.12.137.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA89143D2F for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 02:39:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from TM4525@aol.com) Received: from TM4525@aol.com by imo-m27.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.7.) id 6.12d.4c9e18d5 (3850); Fri, 8 Oct 2004 22:39:53 -0400 (EDT) From: TM4525@aol.com Message-ID: <12d.4c9e18d5.2e98a979@aol.com> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 22:39:53 EDT To: krinklyfig@spymac.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5112 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 02:39:59 -0000 In a message dated 10/8/04 2:25:52 PM Eastern Daylight Time, krinklyfig@spymac.com writes: > You guys are the ones making the claims that 5.3 is "going to be > so great". I just wonder how you come to that conclusion if you > don't have any definitive tests. I dont have a release to test, so > when its done I'll test it. Why don't you download and install the latest 5.3 beta and test it? This is the only way to test 5.3, as there is no "release" yet. If you refuse to test it due to its beta status, then you should probably reconsider your challenges until 5.3 is stable and you can test it for yourself. If this is the case, then all you're doing now is making noise ... and, yes, trolling. ------------------------- I haven't made any "challanges". My point was that there are a lot of people making claims they have no ability to substantiate. And obviously I am correct. A guess a "troll" is anyone who questiong the powers that be. Must be a bunch of communists running the show here.