Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 21:34:34 +0200 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf is MPSAFE? Message-ID: <200505092134.40941.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <427FB6D7.90208@corp.grupos.com.br> References: <427FB6D7.90208@corp.grupos.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Monday 09 May 2005 21:15, Marcus Grando wrote: > pf is MPSAFE in 5.4-RELEASE? I change ipfilter to pf because ipfilter > have LOR in 5.4. But i don't know if pf is MPSAFE. Yes. There is one exception with user/group rules for udp/tcp connections originating for the gateway itself, though. This is described in the pf.conf(5) manual page's BUGS section. ipfilter does not have this feature at all, so this should not be a regression for you. -- /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCf7tQXyyEoT62BG0RAjC4AJ9jPbjWFg529H8xH/GE8Df8VMVhjwCeOdTb T+3D8FExQ15F169k9IP/ULI= =w9GH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200505092134.40941.max>