From owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 17:45:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-python@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0FE516A4CE; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:45:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07E943D5A; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:45:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rrcs-midsouth-24-172-16-118.biz.rr.com [24.172.16.118]) i091j2KY005724; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:45:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) i091ihxc029317; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:44:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Mark Linimon In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-MYWgRsoJzIY2ozuKe6Dd" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1073612696.799.7.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 20:44:57 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Edwin Groothuis cc: Hye-Shik Chang cc: python@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New mailing list: freebsd-python X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 01:45:08 -0000 --=-MYWgRsoJzIY2ozuKe6Dd Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 20:39, Mark Linimon wrote: > > What? PRs assigned to gnome tend to rot? You may want to have a look > > at your stats before saying something like that. >=20 > I have checked, and you are completely correct and I am completely wrong. > I apologize. Not a problem. gnome@ likes to keep as neat of a house as possible.=20 Some PRs may languish for a while, but anything serious we try to get on immediately. >=20 > In fact (including the phoenix ones), there are exactly four, one > of which I'm attempting to work on with the submitter. I think you still have a bug in your reporting tool. I see three (including the two phoenix bugs). The foomatic thing (58460) is not part of GNOME, and we don't maintain any of the foomatic ports (somehow you have that linked to libxml2). >=20 > All I can say is that I must be confusing the build error reports > with the PR reports, or am still not over my sinus infection, or ... > "something". >=20 > (There _are_ more than 4 build errors :-) , some of which look > like they were from a bad run on ia64-5-full.) Yeah, I saw that. After the latest 5.2-RELEASE build, the GNOME errors we fairly low. We still need to work out some porting problems on amd64, but after that, we should be in good shape. >=20 > > As for PRs assigned to phoenix@, those should be moved over to gnome@. >=20 > I will do this. Thanks. >=20 > Again, sorry about shooting from the hip. IMHO we all have > the same goals here: make the ports collection as useful as > possible. Indeed. Joe >=20 > mcl --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-MYWgRsoJzIY2ozuKe6Dd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA//geYb2iPiv4Uz4cRApj2AJ4prJB9zBcGyAb/X66KkE6TUjsBYgCeOVwc dexDiInGe30I45fkCvttCv4= =qfhu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-MYWgRsoJzIY2ozuKe6Dd--