Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 20:44:57 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: python@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New mailing list: freebsd-python Message-ID: <1073612696.799.7.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401081933420.27987-100000@pancho> References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401081933420.27987-100000@pancho>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-MYWgRsoJzIY2ozuKe6Dd Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 20:39, Mark Linimon wrote: > > What? PRs assigned to gnome tend to rot? You may want to have a look > > at your stats before saying something like that. >=20 > I have checked, and you are completely correct and I am completely wrong. > I apologize. Not a problem. gnome@ likes to keep as neat of a house as possible.=20 Some PRs may languish for a while, but anything serious we try to get on immediately. >=20 > In fact (including the phoenix ones), there are exactly four, one > of which I'm attempting to work on with the submitter. I think you still have a bug in your reporting tool. I see three (including the two phoenix bugs). The foomatic thing (58460) is not part of GNOME, and we don't maintain any of the foomatic ports (somehow you have that linked to libxml2). >=20 > All I can say is that I must be confusing the build error reports > with the PR reports, or am still not over my sinus infection, or ... > "something". >=20 > (There _are_ more than 4 build errors :-) , some of which look > like they were from a bad run on ia64-5-full.) Yeah, I saw that. After the latest 5.2-RELEASE build, the GNOME errors we fairly low. We still need to work out some porting problems on amd64, but after that, we should be in good shape. >=20 > > As for PRs assigned to phoenix@, those should be moved over to gnome@. >=20 > I will do this. Thanks. >=20 > Again, sorry about shooting from the hip. IMHO we all have > the same goals here: make the ports collection as useful as > possible. Indeed. Joe >=20 > mcl --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-MYWgRsoJzIY2ozuKe6Dd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA//geYb2iPiv4Uz4cRApj2AJ4prJB9zBcGyAb/X66KkE6TUjsBYgCeOVwc dexDiInGe30I45fkCvttCv4= =qfhu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-MYWgRsoJzIY2ozuKe6Dd--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1073612696.799.7.camel>