Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 15:15:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex <garbanzo@hooked.net> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: gene@nttlabs.com, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, committers@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ELF transition for ports Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.00.9809151513210.221-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org> In-Reply-To: <199809152103.OAA01755@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 15 Sep 1998, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * Does this mean that from now on the version number of such Elf shared > * libraries will be always be higher by one? For example, if the original > * library version goes from 6.4 to 7.0 -- say it's X11R7 :-) -- then will > * the FreeBSD Elf version be 8 since we are using 7 for 6.4? > > It might or might not. Actually, the same thing will happen if the > original version goes from 6.4 to 6.5, ours will be at version 8. That seems _really_ bogus. Pray tell, what's wrong with using two version numbers and ELF libs? If the lib is compiled with -Wl,-soname -Wl,libfoo.so.x and installed like libfoo.so -> libfoo.so.x libfoo.so.x -> libfoo.so.x.y This would preserve the a.out functionality no? And then perhaps, ldconfig could scan each directory, look for an ELF or a.out header, and otherwise throw the library out... thus preventing the ability to load junk files into the cache.. hmm. - alex | "Contrary to popular belief, penguins are not the salvation of modern | | technology. Neither do they throw parties for the urban proletariat." | | Powered by FreeBSD http://www.freebsd.org/ | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.00.9809151513210.221-100000>