Date: Tue, 04 Jul 1995 19:33:13 -0700 From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM> To: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com> Cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freefall.cdrom.com>, "Christoph P. Kukulies" <kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>, freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: 0622 installation woes (/nfs not found) Message-ID: <199507050233.TAA08391@corbin.Root.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 04 Jul 95 19:23:10 PDT." <Pine.BSF.3.91.950704192044.8517B-100000@misery.sdf.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >On Tue, 4 Jul 1995, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > >> since I need to disable rfc1323 and rfc1644 negotiation for tcp connections >> to other freebsd boxes to work. Perhaps the boot floppies should just > > "other freebsd" boxes? As far as I can tell, only a few of the snap >shots had problems with tcp extensions. I don't we should be supporting >nuances of snap shots now that we have a real release. He means through certain terminal servers. The TCP extensions are only negotiated between machines that support them, and at the moment that mostly means FreeBSD and other "Net/3" based machines. Justin's point is that we should probably have these disabled so that people have a chance of getting the bits installed (they should be enabled by default after installation, however). -DG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199507050233.TAA08391>