Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:54:40 -0600 From: Brandon Gooch <jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com> To: Garrett Cooper <gcooper@freebsd.org> Cc: Benjamin Lee <ben@b1c1l1.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Joerg Pulz <Joerg.Pulz@frm2.tum.de> Subject: Re: [CFT+RFC] patch to buildworld with heimdal from ports Message-ID: <AANLkTinXJc7NMw9KUrfe%2Bjqc=6vVqGzOFKTGLeL58kCE@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=fdAv%2BDPrZD=_JSmsDtS_4iU%2BOHv=HE7rL1Jdk@mail.gmail.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1011152143390.51792@unqrf.nqzva.sez2> <4CE1DB90.3000502@b1c1l1.com> <AANLkTin-H2k9jbOKJ5UL0rGC0txDhPnw6uUAYBOAfS6Z@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=fdAv%2BDPrZD=_JSmsDtS_4iU%2BOHv=HE7rL1Jdk@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Garrett Cooper <gcooper@freebsd.org> wrote= : > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Brandon Gooch > <jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Benjamin Lee <ben@b1c1l1.com> wrote: >>> On 11/15/2010 02:08 PM, Joerg Pulz wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> after the security/heimdal port was updated to the current heimdal >>>> release and i added one missing function from base it is now possible = to >>>> completely buildworld src/ using the port for all Kerberos5/GSSAPI >>>> enabled parts. >>> >>> Hi Joerg, >>> >>> I don't think that having the base system depend on a port is the right >>> solution to resolving the libgssapi compatibility problems in base. >>> >>> Did you ever come across the old PR kern/147454 that I submitted in >>> June? =A0In it I included a src patch that replaced the base system's >>> libgssapi with upstream Heimdal's, which resolved all libgssapi >>> compatibility problems. =A0That patch is now stale, but either way I >>> haven't been able to draw enough attention to the issue to have it fixe= d. >> >> I guess we're waiting on someone to review the patch and commit it? >> Hopefully someone can get this in soon, before 8.2 is released. >> >> Is there something wrong with your patch? > > Not according to another person that commented on the patch (and it > sounds like the experience is positive, not negative). Who's the > maintainer of the component? Garrett, where would one look for such an important detail? Source file somewhere? Joerg, how about taking over what's in base? Seems to me like you know what's going on, and you're maintaining the port :) BTW, I'm only beginning to dive into Kerberos on FreeBSD, so I'm not bringing to this discussion much wisdom :/ But I would like all of the pieces to work! -Brandon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinXJc7NMw9KUrfe%2Bjqc=6vVqGzOFKTGLeL58kCE>