From owner-freebsd-security  Thu Mar 22 11:11:28 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [12.23.109.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB6F37B725
	for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 11:11:25 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from brett@lariat.org)
Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.org [12.23.109.2])
	by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA00632;
	Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:10:44 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010322121002.046634e0@localhost>
X-Sender: brett@localhost
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:10:36 -0700
To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>, Chris Byrnes <chris@jeah.net>
From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Subject: Re: DoS attack - advice needed
Cc: <scanner@jurai.net>, Marc Rogers <marcr@shady.org>,
	<freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0103221143100.21839-100000@achilles.silby.co
 m>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0103221121250.8421-100000@awww.jeah.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

At 10:44 AM 3/22/2001, Mike Silbersack wrote:

>The ratelimiting in 4.3 handles that now, so it's not necessary to block
>it anymore.  (Though if you're being pung constantly, I can understand the
>desire to block it.)

"Pung?" 

This gets my vote for neologism of the week.

--Brett


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message