From owner-freebsd-current Thu Sep 28 10:19:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from iclub.nsu.ru (iclub.nsu.ru [193.124.222.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3804E37B424 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 10:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (fjoe@localhost) by iclub.nsu.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA61550; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 00:10:39 +0700 (NSS) (envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 00:10:39 +0700 (NSS) From: Max Khon To: Dan Nelson Cc: Garrett Wollman , Seigo Tanimura , n@nectar.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pw_class in _pw_passwd is null if __hashpw() is not called in prior In-Reply-To: <20000928102400.A17446@dan.emsphone.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi, there! On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Dan Nelson wrote: > > > Here is another possible trouble. While libc.so.4 with nsswitch no > > > longer requires the magic '+' entry, libc.so.3 and earlier still > > > require '+'. > > > > IMHO, This Is A Bug. > > Depends on what Seigo meant. If he meant that libc.so.4 and no > /etc/nsswitch.conf implicitly adds a "+" to the end of /etc/passwd, > that's definitely a bug. If he meant that libc.so.4 and an > nsswitch.conf of "passwd: files nis" doesn't require a "+", that's > fine. "passwd: compat" should require '+' if I understand it correctly /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message