From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jan 22 09:43:34 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id JAA08211 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 22 Jan 1995 09:43:34 -0800 Received: from dataplex.net (SHARK.DATAPLEX.NET [199.183.109.241]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA08205 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 1995 09:43:30 -0800 Received: from [199.183.109.242] by dataplex.net with SMTP (MailShare 1.0b8); Sun, 22 Jan 1995 11:43:15 -0600 X-Sender: wacky@mail.dataplex.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 22 Jan 1995 11:43:16 -0600 To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD Hackers' list) From: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Subject: Which libraries? Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In trying to fix some problems in wu-ftpd, I ran into the fnmatch incompatabilities. They are straight-forward to fix. But in looking into them, I found that there are 4 different versions of fnmatch.c in the -current tree. Is there some reason that we are not using the libc version in each case? And as for that, the version in libc is missing some of the options. Is there some reason that our libc is not the glibc?