From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 19:43:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6E216A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 19:43:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7464243D3F for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 19:43:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from juhasaarinen@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 77so530366rnl for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:43:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.79.75 with SMTP id c75mr4246418rnb; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:42:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.73.29 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:42:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:42:42 +1200 From: Juha Saarinen To: Ronald Klop In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20040923122620.GW16205@nexus.dglawrence.com> cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: "David G. Lawrence" Subject: Re: Could ARG_MAX be increased? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Juha Saarinen List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 19:43:09 -0000 On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 21:37:22 +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: > Can't it be made dependend on kern.maxusers which is dependend on the max > amount of memory available? So people with low memory aren't wasting a lot > of memory? If I understand it right, memory isn't pre-allocated for ARG_MAX, and anyway, the other *BSD's have 256KB so it should be safe to increase it without adding code complexity. -- Juha