From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Feb 6 10:59:06 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA11056 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sat, 6 Feb 1999 10:59:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtp03.wxs.nl (smtp03.wxs.nl [195.121.6.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA11051 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 1999 10:59:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asmodai@wxs.nl) Received: from daemon.ninth-circle.org ([195.121.56.130]) by smtp03.wxs.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 3.61) with ESMTP id AAA34C4; Sat, 6 Feb 1999 19:59:02 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 06 Feb 1999 20:07:57 +0100 (CET) Organization: Ninth Circle Enterprises From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai To: Paul Dekkers Subject: RE: how y2k-compliant is 2.2.1R? Cc: FreeBSD Mailinglist Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 06-Feb-99 Paul Dekkers wrote: > I have a box here running FreeBSD 2.2.1, how y2k compliant is it? > (Is it worth upgrading? It's a box with many users on it, and even our > main server, so it would cost a bit work I think :-)) The last few weeks a lot of effort has been put into fishing out the last Y2k bugs. So the best bet would be to migrate to 3.1 which will hit the world somewhere next week... At least, that's my opinion... --- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven join #FreeBSD on Undernet asmodai(at)wxs.nl Time is merely a residue of Reality... Network/Security Specialist *BSD: Powered by Knowledge & Know-how To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message