From owner-freebsd-ports Sun May 30 8:30:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from spooky.rwwa.com (rwwa.com [198.115.177.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1333914C99; Sun, 30 May 1999 08:30:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from witr@rwwa.com) Received: from spooky.rwwa.com (localhost.rwwa.com [127.0.0.1]) by spooky.rwwa.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA25749; Sun, 30 May 1999 11:29:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from witr@rwwa.com) Message-Id: <199905301529.LAA25749@spooky.rwwa.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Dean Lombardo Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a two-level port system? In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 27 May 1999 16:01:28 BST." <374D5E48.15A2D82B@excite.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 11:29:22 -0400 From: Robert Withrow Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Alternatively, is it possible to have the port tree be essentially empty (perhaps just the makefile and category directories) and then just have it fetch the makefiles and make the directories on demand, for the individal ports? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert Withrow, R.W. Withrow Associates, Swampscott MA, witr@rwwa.COM To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message