From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Mar 13 17:17:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from host07.rwsystems.net (kasie.rwsystems.net [209.197.192.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB1A14F3D; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 17:17:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jwyatt@RWSystems.net) Received: from kasie.rwsystems.net([209.197.192.103]) (1259 bytes) by host07.rwsystems.net via sendmail with P:esmtp/R:bind_hosts/T:inet_zone_bind_smtp (sender: ) id for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 18:51:12 -0600 (CST) (Smail-3.2.0.104 1998-Nov-20 #1 built 1998-Dec-24) Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 18:51:12 -0600 (CST) From: James Wyatt To: Mark Mayo Cc: Gary Palmer , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Mail server setup In-Reply-To: <19990312015634.B6746@vmunix.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Mark Mayo wrote: > up my thoughts as "I like the idea of network accessable storage - I > just wish there was something better than NFS to do it with! Oh well, > guess I'll have to use NFS, but do the application so that it actually > works..". 8-) Samba? 1/2 of a 8{) We've found it to be better for our NT boxes to access than NFS (even though Exceed's products and support are good). Seriously, has anyone compared the performance of the two? Is anyone using Samba for unix mounts? Is it a workstation toy or stronger than NFS? I just know it works for our current use and I have been wondering if I could do more with it... - Jy@ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message