From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 16:50:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531B91065675 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:50:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10FF8FC18 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id TAA18270; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:50:45 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4E440865.1040500@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:50:45 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110705 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Hartland References: <47F0D04ADF034695BC8B0AC166553371@multiplay.co.uk><4E4380C0.7070908@FreeBSD.org> <4E43E272.1060204@FreeBSD.org> <62BF25D0ED914876BEE75E2ADF28DDF7@multiplay.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <62BF25D0ED914876BEE75E2ADF28DDF7@multiplay.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: debugging frequent kernel panics on 8.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:50:49 -0000 on 11/08/2011 19:37 Steven Hartland said the following: > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andriy Gapon" > >> >> I would really appreciate if you could try to reproduce the problem with the patch >> that I sent earlier. > > Hi Andriy, what's the risk of this patch causing other issues? I can not estimate. The code is supposed to affect only things that happen after panic, so make your guess. > I ask as to get results from this we've going to have to roll it > out to over 130+ production machines, so I'd like to be clear on > the risks before I sign that off. I will be happy if you try the patch on a single machine provided the problem is that reproducible. -- Andriy Gapon