From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 8 17:28:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38081065670 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 17:28:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ruud@stack.nl) Received: from mx1.stack.nl (relay02.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8298FC18 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 17:28:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hammer.stack.nl (hammer.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::153]) by mx1.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B713592FD; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 19:28:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hammer.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 1965) id 27AC660EB; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 19:28:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 19:28:57 +0200 From: Ruud Althuizen To: RW Message-ID: <20120608172857.GE2410@stack.nl> References: <86r4tqotjo.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20120608174708.65bc90db@gumby.homeunix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lMM8JwqTlfDpEaS6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120608174708.65bc90db@gumby.homeunix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Default password hash X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ruud Althuizen List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 17:28:58 -0000 --lMM8JwqTlfDpEaS6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri 08 Jun 2012 05:47 PM, RW wrote: > On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 14:51:55 +0200 > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote: >=20 > > We still have MD5 as our default password hash, even though known-hash > > attacks against MD5 are relatively easy these days. =20 >=20 > Are any of those attacks relevant to salted passwords even with a > single MD5 hash, let alone FreeBSD's complicated iterative algorithm?=20 Complication isn't your friend when considering cryptography. --=20 With kind regards, Ruud Althuizen --lMM8JwqTlfDpEaS6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/SNlkACgkQkqncCMFskRU+NgCfXMQOI9o3edJJDVEeqQQB3qQT OJsAoIMswOLjYAWVS5XKEs2Sci5iB7AJ =fysR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lMM8JwqTlfDpEaS6--