Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 16:43:11 -0500 From: hawk <hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu> To: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: browsers [was: Re: linux-netscape6 gives segmentation fault?? Message-ID: <200102162143.f1GLhB628230@fac13.ds.psu.edu> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:17:22 CST." <14989.39138.34303.608102@guru.mired.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
mike mentioned, > > Cookie handling is *much* better than anything else out there. > I seriously doubt that; unfortunately, the best thing I've seen for > cookie handling (and about a dozen other things) I've run into doesn't > run on PC hardware. ANy cookie gets a response of Y/A/N/V (and something else, i think) for Yes/Always/No/Never accept cookies from the domain, as well as accept and reject domains in the config file. > I use w3m pretty much the same way you use lynx. I switched when the > lynx port was marked broken for security reasons. w3m has two > advantages over the lynx I was using at the time: 1) table & frame > rendering is better; 2) it has three external browsers. So I have one > that launches an xterm running w3m like you do; one that launches > netscape, and one that adds the link to my hotlist. The downside - no > numbered links :-(. I've toyed with patching lynx for the extra browser . . . and it already has its bookmarks like your hotlist. I tried w3m for a few days, and it drove me nuts. I didn't run across any tables on anything I wanted to see that displayed well in 80 columns. And it was just to fragile and easy to bomb out of . . . hawk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102162143.f1GLhB628230>