From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 27 16:19:34 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id QAA24007 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 16:19:34 -0800 Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA23993; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 16:19:25 -0800 Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id QAA27740; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 16:18:25 -0800 From: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-Id: <199502280018.QAA27740@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: Binary compatibility with NetBSD To: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 1995 16:18:25 -0800 (PST) Cc: nate@trout.sri.MT.net, jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <9502280011.AA04179@cs.weber.edu> from "Terry Lambert" at Feb 27, 95 05:11:41 pm Content-Type: text Content-Length: 488 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > Would CTM'ing the library portion of the NetBSD tree be satisfactory? > > > > What would you expect this to do ? > > Keep the history that Nate is unhappy about losing even if FreeBSD > is only an OEM of the library code and doesn't really need the history > itself. I guess you mean CVS then. CTM is more like "rdist" than like "CVS"... -- Poul-Henning Kamp TRW Financial Systems, Inc. I am Pentium Of Borg. Division is Futile. You WILL be approximated.