From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 4 02:02:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B39DB84 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 02:02:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sjg@evilcode.net) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7A78FC18 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 02:02:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l1so6360173vba.13 for ; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 19:02:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=LSCxwJOODqBdnWn7MxoxxxAPja9BkrQjcmu2MSyMy7M=; b=Nash+NbO+4GZhTf9UYG89OSSHUpBwJfocY3WMJ7Xu+0q6SrrgUg4ItOj2isu2y85v5 4Drk1ME/O1522otKbT6jOd41La6PZBYhjyI0wZscmnnPmOR7xPPj8lzFTjXQkrHgLlkf jAzlStqwjMbG1NVWzAGJaz+PKCjJUs0m6wpd9Iu3Q6O4RmRg2lWw3tVWBtaOsI8VTs5Q 4mCbKkUc5NHWD4RuXvXqTflbNkYZNhLj0sjx193VnXstx87vw3K9ceYRsyjIClgnVt7R m0YoGBEy1KIznW/Nw3jrNzEzU5PrP8P6Nih/MlMs9R0am/xB0Mg6oz6oFFyr50WMFPdB sI3w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.92.97 with SMTP id cl1mr5097183vdb.65.1351994521744; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 19:02:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.3.136 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 19:02:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <509531DF.6050108@mu.org> References: <509531DF.6050108@mu.org> Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 20:02:01 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DragonFly vs FreeBSD scheduler From: "Samuel J. Greear" To: Alfred Perlstein Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnCgJG+OtbazJ68YlAZePhgpOzyDljCKhzmtBqsCsd+OZP0UcDY4RE480e0l/ZIUwSYG7lD X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 04:57:46 +0000 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Alie Tan X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 02:02:03 -0000 > Looks like a few specific benchmarks that DragonFly aimed to do well at that > we were unawares of. > Unawares of? http://bsd.slashdot.org/story/08/03/06/1313218/freebsd-70-bests-linux-in-smp-performance The FreeBSD project made hay with sysbench and pgbench not that long ago. > Not sure, didn't see DragonFly sharing the results with us until this paper > was published although I may have missed that. > Is the DragonFly project under some obligation to share its results with the FreeBSD developers? > -Alfred