From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Nov 27 18:10:22 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from zorch.sf-bay.org (zorch.sf-bay.org [192.150.103.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1288A37B4CF for ; Mon, 27 Nov 2000 18:10:20 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by zorch.sf-bay.org (8.11.1/8.8.2) with UUCP id eAS294435903 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2000 18:09:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from scott@localhost) by zorba.sf-bay.org (8.11.1/8.8.8) id eAS267268728 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2000 18:06:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scott) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 18:06:07 -0800 (PST) From: Scott Hazen Mueller Message-Id: <200011280206.eAS267268728@zorba.sf-bay.org> Subject: Re: atadisk problem? To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Envelope-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >Nov 27 14:24:12 zorch /kernel: ad0: HARD WRITE ERROR blk# 29409399ad0: HARD WRITE ERROR blk# 29409399 status=79 error=04 >Nov 27 14:24:12 zorch /kernel: ad0: DMA problem fallback to PIO mode >Nov 27 14:24:15 zorch /kernel: ad0: HARD READ ERROR blk# 0 status=79 error=04 >Nov 27 14:24:15 zorch /kernel: ad0: reading primary partition table: error reading fsbn 0 Yah, bad form to follow-up to one's own post, but I left out one bit of info. The block# is not the same one each time around... ad0: HARD WRITE ERROR blk# 29409399 status=79 error=04 ad0: HARD WRITE ERROR blk# 722175 status=71 error=04 ad0: HARD WRITE ERROR blk# 6129535 status=71 error=04 ad0: HARD WRITE ERROR blk# 7504879 status=71 error=04 ad0: HARD WRITE ERROR blk# 19272567 status=71 error=04 No pattern that I can see, except one of no repeats. \scott To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message