From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 01:24:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6F81065670 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:24:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@com.jkkn.dk) Received: from blackbird.jkkn.net (cl-7.cph-01.dk.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:16d8:dd00:6::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566428FC18 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.3.4] (hp.home.jkkn.net [192.168.3.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by blackbird.jkkn.net (envelope-from freebsd@com.jkkn.dk) (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o6S1NxC0011695 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:24:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@com.jkkn.dk) Message-ID: <4C4F86AD.9040703@com.jkkn.dk> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:23:57 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kristian_Kr=E6mmer_Nielsen?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.1 at blackbird.jkkn.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Time to upgrade the pf port in FreeBSD ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:24:03 -0000 Hey, As of time being, we still include pf as of OpenBSD 4.1 (released May 2007). Recently syntax has changed a lot in the releases of pf in OpenBSD 4.7, just notice that "nat-to" and "rtr-to" are now part of the pass-commands. This means also means that refereeing to the OpenBSD FAQ from the FreeBSD manual is close to useless. I have not be able to find a online copy of the FAQ for PF from OpenBSD 4.1, so simply changing the documentation link is not an easy option. The later version of pf is easier to use. So I was wondering, how many is actually using pf and is it time to get together and update the current port of pf included in FreeBSD to a more recent version?, e.x. the version from OpenBSD 4.7? Has anyone considered this? / is anyone interested in doing this? Best regards, Kristian Krĉmmer, Odense, Denmark