From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 16 05:11:37 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDE037B401
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 May 2003 05:11:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tcoip.com.br (erato.tco.net.br [200.220.254.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057FC43F3F
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 May 2003 05:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dcs@tcoip.com.br)
Received: from tcoip.com.br ([10.0.2.6])
	by mail.tcoip.com.br (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4GCBI928363;
	Fri, 16 May 2003 09:11:20 -0300
Message-ID: <3EC4D566.5070306@tcoip.com.br>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 09:11:18 -0300
From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@tcoip.com.br>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030416
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, pt-br, ja
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org>
References: <200305152344.h4FNi4gN032787@grimreaper.grondar.org>
In-Reply-To: <200305152344.h4FNi4gN032787@grimreaper.grondar.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: arch@freebsd.org
cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Subject: Re: NOCRYPT / NOSECURE
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 12:11:37 -0000

Mark Murray wrote:
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
> 
>>Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org> writes:
>>
>>>If openssl's des(1) is the same as our bdes(1) (ie, gives the same results)
>>>then I'm in support of this.
>>
>>I haven't compared OpenSSL'S des(1) directly with bdes(1), but they
>>are both ports (or reimplementations) of Sun's des(1), and I've used
>>OpenSSL's des(1) in the past to exchange data with Solaris users who
>>were using Sun's des(1).
> 
> 
> I've converted our bdes(1) to use the openSSL library. I've also done
> ed(1). :-). libcipher is now OBE.

1) What happens if I compile with no crypto (whatever it is/will be 
called these days)?

2) ed(1) is /bin/ed. Won't that cause trouble?

-- 
Daniel C. Sobral                   (8-DCS)
Gerencia de Operacoes
Divisao de Comunicacao de Dados
Coordenacao de Seguranca
VIVO Centro Oeste Norte
Fones: 55-61-313-7654/Cel: 55-61-9618-0904
E-mail: Daniel.Capo@tco.net.br
         Daniel.Sobral@tcoip.com.br
         dcs@tcoip.com.br

Outros:
	dcs@newsguy.com
	dcs@freebsd.org
	capo@notorious.bsdconspiracy.net

Chocolate Chip.