Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:23:22 +0200
From:      Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Deadlock between GEOM and devfs device destroy and process exit.
Message-ID:  <4B636DEA.2060901@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100129231110.GS3877@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
References:  <4B636812.8060403@FreeBSD.org> <20100129231110.GS3877@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:58:26AM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Experimenting with SATA hot-plug I've found quite repeatable deadlock
>> case. Problem observed when several SATA devices, opened via devfs,
>> disappear at exactly same time. In my case, at time of unplugging SATA
>> Port Multiplier with several disks beyond it. All I have to do is to run
>> several `dd if=/dev/adaX of=/dev/null bs=1m &` commands and unplug
>> multiplier. That causes predictable I/O errors and devices destruction.
>> But with high probability several dd processes getting stuck in kernel.
>>
>> I've discovered such pieces of problem:
>> - CAM receives disconnect event and starts device destruction. But as
>> device is still opened, it can't do it immediately.
>> - dd receives I/O error and exits.
>> - exit1() call closes all descriptors, including adaX device. It
>> triggers final device destruction, by sending event to geom_dev.
>>
>> adaclose(4571fa00,4,40c16576,76,0,...) at 0x4049c521
>> g_disk_access(457e2200,ffffffff,0,0,0,...) at 0x4080b9a4
>> g_access(45643d80,ffffffff,0,0,2000,...) at 0x40810ccb
>> g_dev_close(45766500,1,2000,4569fd80,4569fd80,...) at 0x4080a425
>> devfs_close(7b604aa8,80000,457f8000,80000,7b604acc,...) at 0x407f2762
>> VOP_CLOSE_APV(40d03180,7b604aa8,40c2e681,128,0,...) at 0x40b6da55
>> vn_close(457f8000,1,45624300,4569fd80,451271e0,...) at 0x40912750
>> vn_closefile(4566da48,4569fd80,4566da48,0,7b604b58,...) at 0x40912854
>> devfs_close_f(4566da48,4569fd80,3,0,4566da48,...) at 0x407f235b
>> _fdrop(4566da48,4569fd80,7b604b8c,408b5cec,0,4569fe24,40eb23a8,40d10460,40c1a8bb,4560672c,721,40c1a8b2,7b604bb4,40878220,4560672c,8,40c1a8b2,721)
>> at 0x40836da3
>> closef(4566da48,4569fd80,721,71e,4569fe24,...) at 0x40838ad0
>> fdfree(4569fd80,0,40c1b1a9,107,7b604c80,...) at 0x408394da
>> exit1(4569fd80,100,7b604d2c,40b565c0,4569fd80,...) at 0x40844423
>> sys_exit(4569fd80,7b604cf8,40c59d34,40c26be4,4569d2a8,...) at 0x408450fd
>> syscall(7b604d38) at 0x40b565c0
>>
>> - GEOM event thread tries to destroy /dev/adaX device (which should be
>> already free at this moment), but for some reason freezes, waiting for
>> device to be freed:
>>
>>     0     2     0   0  -8  0      0      8 devdrn DL    ??    0:02.89
>> [g_event]
>>
>> - as GEOM event is still not handled, exit1() waits for it:
>>
>> kdb_backtrace(40c16bc4,0,40c16ab1,56,4540e640,...) at 0x408a2909
>> g_waitidle(4569fd80,0,40c1b1a9,107,7b604c80,...) at 0x4080cd1f
>> exit1(4569fd80,100,7b604d2c,40b565c0,4569fd80,...) at 0x40844431
>> sys_exit(4569fd80,7b604cf8,40c59d34,40c26be4,4569d2a8,...) at 0x408450fd
>> syscall(7b604d38) at 0x40b565c0
>>
>> - system stationary. GEOM frozen. No way to get out of this, except
>> pushing reset.
>>
>>     0  1065  1055   0  44  0   5344   3040 g_wait DE     0    0:00.43 dd
>> if=/dev/ada1 of=/dev/null bs=1m
>>     0  1066  1055   0  44  0   5344   3040 GEOM t DE     0    0:00.07 dd
>> if=/dev/ada2 of=/dev/null bs=1m
>>
>>
>> So, does anybody have good idea why destroy_dev() can't complete?
> 
> The devdrn state means that thread performing the device destruction,
> i.e. the thread called destroy_dev(), is waiting for threads to leave
> the cdevsw d_* methods. The thread that notified the destruction thread
> did that from d_close() method. This resulted in the deadlock.

d_close() doesn't call destroy_dev() directly. It schedules different
thread to do it. destroy_dev() should run after d_close() already
complete. Though I haven't checked how it is locked.

> I introduced destroy_dev_sched(9) KPI to handle this and similar issues.
> Note that race-free use of destroy_dev_sched(9) is quite hard.

I think it should work without it here. Shouldn't it?

-- 
Alexander Motin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B636DEA.2060901>