From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 18:42:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C724316A41F; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:42:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from murray@freebsdmall.com) Received: from mail.freebsdmall.com (ns1.freebsdmall.com [69.50.233.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CDFC43D45; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:42:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from murray@freebsdmall.com) Received: by mail.freebsdmall.com (Postfix, from userid 2074) id 7AF191CC77; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:42:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:42:27 -0800 From: Murray Stokely To: Alex Dupre Message-ID: <20051110184227.GA45346@freebsdmall.com> References: <200511091408.jA9E89WX058087@repoman.freebsd.org> <20051109141439.GB25580@abigail.blackend.org> <1131562950.673.5.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> <43724EE2.6080908@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43724EE2.6080908@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Step back and think about this for a moment .. (was Re: cvs commit: www/en/layout/css global.css) X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:42:27 -0000 On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 08:32:50PM +0100, Alex Dupre wrote: > Joel Dahl wrote: > >Everything is too big and ugly. We're back at the pre-redesign state. > > I prefer the previous version, too. Now the normal size text is too big > and some single-lines are splitted into two rows. I tried with firefox > (default installation) on a 1280x1024 and 1152x864 19" display. [picking a random message to reply to] I don't mean to dampen anyone's enthusiasm for working on this, but I really think that Emily was doing a better job at testing her CSS changes on a broad spectrum of OS/www/resolution combinations that she was given credit for. She offered to address the complaints and put them through her normal testing matrix but we seem to have brushed her aside in the rush to "fix" things and I think that is a mistake since we're seeing people come to the same realizations about tradeoffs that Emily had long since come across. - Murray