Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 21:04:34 +0200 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Akinori MUSHA <knu@iDaemons.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Using DEPORIGIN in portupgrade Message-ID: <20021031190434.GD65722@vega.vega.com> In-Reply-To: <86iszicu5a.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> References: <3DAD5BCA.8D2B10F@FreeBSD.org> <3DAEAA2A.8502F644@FreeBSD.org> <86n0pczq6u.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <86k7jycuy2.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <20021031185531.GA65722@vega.vega.com> <86iszicu5a.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 03:58:41AM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote: > At Thu, 31 Oct 2002 20:55:31 +0200, > sobomax wrote: > > What makes you think so? DEPORIGIN generation support was merged > > into bsd.port.mk before 4.7-RELEASE, so that all packages generated > > for it already have DEPORIGIN information recorded. Grab any > > package from ftp.freebsd.org or from the 4.7 CD and see by yourself. > > I was talking about ports, not packages. I think ports should or > could also record DEPORIGIN when they are installed. They do. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021031190434.GD65722>