From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr 22 22:49:28 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4BB916A401
	for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 22:49:28 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dacut@kanga.org)
Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.200.81])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65CD743D45
	for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 22:49:28 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dacut@kanga.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1]
	(c-67-182-132-101.hsd1.wa.comcast.net[67.182.132.101])
	by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP
	id <2006042222492601100r48q2e>; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 22:49:27 +0000
Message-ID: <444AB2F6.3070502@kanga.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 15:49:26 -0700
From: David Cuthbert <dacut@kanga.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
References: <44490663.3040506@hotlz.com>
	<86d5f9pno8.fsf@xps.des.no>	<444A652E.5010403@kanga.org>
	<864q0lplro.fsf@xps.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <864q0lplro.fsf@xps.des.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0616-4, 04/21/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: Why is not more FreeBSD software written in C++?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Non technical items related to the community
	<freebsd-chat.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 22:49:29 -0000

Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Whatever you may think, C and C++ are not defined by ANSI.

I took contention with your notion that they didn't "care one whit" 
about ANSI, not that C/C++ are defined by ANSI.

> And please get a proper MUA, so I don't have to fix your quoting when
> replying.

You're a big boy.  Given that you care about this pedanticness, you can 
deal with it.