From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 9 08:03:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF32AA061B for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 08:03:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0706CB for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 08:03:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0C4CFAA061A; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 08:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE58AA0619 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 08:03:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x22c.google.com (mail-pa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1A836CA; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 08:02:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pa0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id kp3so4272353pab.1; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:02:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xl8lmibhzhFBL30JSgSTLYm1KNdf/ffRlEKvQEh/4JI=; b=h0njifux7cq0W6ZxxZhtM4Xc0rgHoskoeQSBmIEVjZUtQKUOwnuvx6QN8VQ3hh95DZ Xu6+MR+ov3CfPLW9Pm++rqdBl5tLuR17HWfW6QV93RBLOQQ8vcif4PyFVUE2PtuhVDv8 DESf60NUvBwK9O14NDFoopTfqgWCN7FqSH89EkjE6AjJMVGmstQw8MJZUy5J1a2DZ1bg DfJ90AeEoz1fHpLNMawvLhmI2iiSPsDQ+QSGJ/Ogrj3LQECaOUUUFEjPnVVa4uilTlzd bytz+stlgRjGkj5HRTit1JqA4N4Si8M8tL5qb+BKeU46m3STh4DK69K4vB8oGXe4k8bh Gi4g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xl8lmibhzhFBL30JSgSTLYm1KNdf/ffRlEKvQEh/4JI=; b=RO+NlcIDCVlmzZUr9TbtoM26xTJf81F5Q6vpqRHNRQGU68x6eUjSxAAq0WiJF7UR2n 9TJM3GjyrckNY2jaFkxjxOrzcrqS/bKhHEAdpBkIb9+pAkSdjEymctQmB19vLZRJQsdu yuwTi/Iw5oDNEfhmJFsoviENm3f4Bd8KfK8u+7023/OfPl01TqKMRce7DYBZqw/cJY1J YPiRN9R7DCbX6BOdkZWXe+GFgccmCFsG6gWUGIEi2sd3QvXdqWCK/WAIrY1qr3xOSiLm Qye/83IMaqHY1UxZC2VfJNFESfA2Uh+kLIOnIXUDPmrM02pG/UZNwhuU2JmryLrNzIbi ziAw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORcQw37rumhoJ9hZx4h/RfUEskbtOIanScBpvELVQ/d6H80IhVBs6chE70lv6MebA== X-Received: by 10.66.156.195 with SMTP id wg3mr47938949pab.54.1455004979519; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:02:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.149] ([120.29.76.9]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id lq10sm48382567pab.36.2016.02.09.00.02.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:02:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <56B99D2D.4030402@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 16:02:53 +0800 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Oberman CC: Greg 'groggy' Lehey , "ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Removing documentation References: <20160207000304.GA71035@eureka.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 08:03:00 -0000 Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey > wrote: > >> I'm bringing this to the attention of the ports community to try to >> come up with a consensus about how to handle existing documentation >> for ageing packages, in this case portmaster. >> >> This bug report suggests removing the documentation for portmaster >> because it is out of date and no longer maintained. >> 3 or 4 years ago the handbook never recommended any port. Only utility tools contained in the base release were allowed to be documented in the handbook. This standard should be enforced again. The tool portmaster and ezjail should be removed from the handbook or be included as part of the base system release.