Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 28 Oct 2000 17:37:30 +0100
From:      Jamie Heckford <heckfordj@psi-domain.co.uk>
To:        freebsd-announce@freebsd.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Open hardware standards for FreeBSD??
Message-ID:  <00102817380200.00919@freefire.psi-domain.co.uk>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Fellow FreeBSD'ers

Would anyone out their be *interested* in me and anyone else who wants to join
in starting some sort of FreeBSD hardware standards body?

I am writing to this list in order to propose an industry-wide set of
performance standards for FreeBSD based hardware suppliers.

Whilst attempting to rate each and every product that our company provides
in terms of desired application (e.g. Cluster Nodes, Database Server, Desktop,
File Server, Mail Server, Printer Server, Router, Web Server, etc.), and in
terms of desired performance, I thought that we (FreeBSD hardware suppliers)
should have some sort of 'standards' base.

I'm not talking *raw* performance figures against each type of FreeBSD system
provided (like SPECcpu2000, etc. from www.spec.org) like Sun and the like
use, but maybe a classification based on application. Thus, our customers would
instantly be re-assured that a box from XXX company would perform or be able
to do similar tasks to a box from YYY company whilst still complying to their
required specifications - just by checking its classification rating.

To make things clearer - say we agreed that for a box (of any spec) to
perform adequately well as a Web server, it would need to be able to handle X
number of page views a minute (or second, or whatever). Then, for each box in
our varying product ranges that could serve the X pages per minute, we could
rubber-stamp them as being fit for the purpose of Web serving. This concept
could be further extended to include sub-categorisations like 'Web Server
Class 1', 'Web Server Class II', and so on.

(Ok, page views a minute might not be the best example, as performance
really
comes down to NIC, cabling and bandwidth - but I hope that you get picture!)

Is this a good thing?? Let me know your thoughts.

Regards,

-- 
Jamie Heckford
Chief Network Engineer
Psi-Domain - Innovative Linux Solutions. Ask Us How.

===================================
email:     heckfordj@psi-domain.co.uk
web:      http://www.psi-domain.co.uk/

tel:        +44 (0)1737 789 246
fax:        +44 (0)1737 789 245
mobile:     +44 (0)7779 646 529
===================================


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00102817380200.00919>