From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 16 19:52:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AABD16A42C; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:52:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7337343D48; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:52:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id D2BAC740; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:52:03 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:52:03 -0600 To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060316195203.GD8399@soaustin.net> References: <20060316104352.GA47614@alaska.cert.siemens.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060316104352.GA47614@alaska.cert.siemens.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: bugmaster@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Submitted PRs missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:52:05 -0000 On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 11:43:52AM +0100, Udo Schweigert wrote: > a couple of hours ago I submitted three PRs (for security/nessus-*, > security/nessus-*-devel, and mail/mutt-devel) using send-pr. None of them > made it to gnats or showed up here. > > For one of them (but I do not know which) I got a "spam detection > notification" telling me that I should submit my PR via the web-interface > (which will break the patches to be submitted) or posting it to freebsd-bugs. There was some kind of failure yesterday which resulted in a large number of false positives. There are still 10 PRs in the queue that Ceri or I will have to rescue out of there. (I may not be able to do this until this evening, USA time.) The way things work, there is a spamassassin trap that I generally try to clean out once a day. I tweaked the ruleset about 3 months ago and it is *much* better at preventing bogus PRs from being created. So far it has run about one false positive a month, including PRs over the 500k limit. This is with catching about 3x as many bogus things as we did before. After that PRs are assigned to 'pending' if they look bogus to GNATS. These are evenly split between spams that make it through the ruleset, but which are recognized as invalid PR formatting, and PRs where people reply to the initial PR Subject: line (the one without the 'category/number' prefix), or where their mailer mangles the contents, generally by using printed-quotable. The latter we try to rescue, when feasible. There are around 5-10 of these on an average day. In general if you do not see a response from GNATS within a few hours, you should go ahead and send email to bugmaster@FreeBSD.org so that we can determine what's up. But note that these queues are only checked once or twice a day. Finally, if your email address does not reverse resolve, GNATS will never see the report, because hub refuses email from addresses that do not reverse resolve on the theory that 99.99% of them are from botnets. mcl