From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Dec 30 09:11:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3051C9137E for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 09:11:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from v.maffione@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x244.google.com (mail-oi0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFCD21282; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 09:11:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from v.maffione@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x244.google.com with SMTP id u15so57349308oie.3; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 01:11:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=J1tqkPrEHKOC/Ocv7GkA7hhpo1vn05Al8TLgy1hFyu0=; b=Tvyvypqo6FdquOl3WJTQGFrJn5CdgjRkveEv7mOWQMzavqeFlUyi/AWd3cP0AOa4at 4gOACRwY0ObYhTNnYDvK/Un1z5SrJBRGrlv9gWr83gjlUGq8Lrs09QAi0Ka+YXGljt4j xwrRhTX2DVMdiHPw5otanxNuUY0Q8aJnseJZhPx0GAz20e/oQ0a6sssraYm6hVngEbCD xLQikgBsrqcruxYffq2sD1lFOOO6ud6QBkw7XpCiSia0hVe7RK9uDp4isfQM4UKRaLGk RAOV09w5EVLTlkDUROc7sUQrMW0k+4RKmLpx9BZO/MVndyNSHAobec5O1V4radzQcqBc AkAg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=J1tqkPrEHKOC/Ocv7GkA7hhpo1vn05Al8TLgy1hFyu0=; b=Ck58gVUuXLGdIz+37ynQdqXe4RmYXJuxfjgahO576vFEkxcfLJuzmk24In0nCBdCu6 wGkoubZDPQ/npJ0zy+y9pI0Tr8aLmXLNJwVLo7HcHHO624oJJVRywt0So/5Y3B8hdV7u 3IFetcNkGPSs2Hz9p8C+3OfoL4lLP1tJvkNy6Z/Ct2+WM4/SNNzeIIv/5odVkvdI6wXi pF6nOft/Ovl+q6h/SDfsZYGtoq5qEw+k11vNUXquO0FGTjQdF7uqz8moEEQAcjI1SlS2 QsCWzIVHnoFIXwnpcuvKu3lojBt06OE9I2p5JEumwBUnTxNKXQdoB6DH3xnLuB1GVUcB 8BcQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKv3gzozP8Mt9hDgkZCugC3d8QDlBGA1Gaz4EZybh3m+dn6ZVaZh8ukuH2FHrNagD53RVYBF8VVLe5XHw== X-Received: by 10.157.60.238 with SMTP id t43mr23959223otf.178.1483089084948; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 01:11:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.45.200 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 01:11:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <28018209.hrnUzHgbYH@ralph.baldwin.cx> References: <20161217222812.GA4979@ox> <9729046.di4hkLAXiP@ralph.baldwin.cx> <28018209.hrnUzHgbYH@ralph.baldwin.cx> From: Vincenzo Maffione Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 10:11:24 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: cxgbe's native netmap support broken since r307394 To: John Baldwin Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , Luigi Rizzo , Adrian Chadd , Giuseppe Lettieri , Luigi Rizzo , Navdeep Parhar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 09:11:26 -0000 Ok! Can anyone commit this? Luigi seems to be ok with the change. Thanks, Vincenzo 2016-12-29 19:16 GMT+01:00 John Baldwin : > On Thursday, December 29, 2016 10:02:32 AM Vincenzo Maffione wrote: >> Ok, thanks for the clarification. I change the lock type to MTX_DEF >> (and did a test). I attached the new patch. > > Looks good to me, thanks! > >> Cheers, >> Vincenzo >> >> 2016-12-29 2:06 GMT+01:00 John Baldwin : >> > On Wednesday, December 28, 2016 07:25:22 PM Vincenzo Maffione wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> The "worker_lock" is taken by nm_os_kthread_wakeup_worker(), which >> >> in turn is called by nm_pt_host_notify(). The latter function is a >> >> callback that may be called by a driver interrupt service routine; >> >> more precisely this happens when the driver calls netmap_tx_irq() or >> >> netmap_rx_irq(). As far as I know in FreeBSD it is not possible to >> >> lock a MTX_DEF mtx inside an ISR. Am I wrong on this? >> > >> > It depends. Most interrupt handlers run in ithreads and can use MTX_DEF. >> > Only interrupt handlers that run from a filter are restricted to using >> > MTX_SPIN. Looking at all the calls to netmap_[tr]x_irq() in the tree, >> > they are all done from contexts that are safe to use MTX_DEF (and in >> > general they have to be as the equivalent code for the non-netmap case >> > is calling routines like if_input or m_freem that can't be invoked from >> > a filter either). >> > >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Vincenzo >> >> >> >> 2016-12-28 19:06 GMT+01:00 John Baldwin : >> >> > Why are you using MTX_SPIN? Changing the lock type to MTX_DEF would seem to >> >> > be a smaller patch and probably more correct for FreeBSD. >> >> > >> >> > On Thursday, December 22, 2016 05:29:41 PM Luigi Rizzo wrote: >> >> >> sure go ahead and thank you! >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> >> >> > ok, does anyone mind if I commit it as-is? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > -a >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On 21 December 2016 at 13:37, Vincenzo Maffione wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Luigi, >> >> >> >> I attached a minimal change containing two fixes: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - change IFNET_WLOCK into IFNET_RLOCK, to fix the cxgbe issue related >> >> >> >> to this thread >> >> >> >> - use the proper locking functions for the "worker_lock", unrelated >> >> >> >> but needed to avoid the O.S. to trap because of a mismatch between >> >> >> >> MTX_SPIN and MTX_DEF. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> >> Vincenzo >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2016-12-21 20:30 GMT+01:00 Luigi Rizzo : >> >> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Vincenzo Maffione >> >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >> >>>> Hi, >> >> >> >>>> There is no commit related to that in the FreeBSD svn or git. >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> The fix has been published to the github netmap repository here >> >> >> >>>> (branch master): https://github.com/luigirizzo/netmap >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> What we should do is to import all the recent updates from the github >> >> >> >>>> into HEAD. I can prepare a patch for HEAD, if you wish. Just let me >> >> >> >>>> know. >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> I just checked and the diff between FreeBSD head and netmap head >> >> >> >>> in github is almost 3k lines due to a lot of recent refactoring. >> >> >> >>> So, if there is an easy way to extract just the locking change that would >> >> >> >>> be preferable as an interim solution. >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> cheers >> >> >> >>> luigi >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> Cheers, >> >> >> >>>> Vincenzo >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> 2016-12-20 21:45 GMT+01:00 Adrian Chadd : >> >> >> >>>>> hi, >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> What's the commit? We should get it into -HEAD asap. >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> -adrian >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> On 20 December 2016 at 01:25, Vincenzo Maffione wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>> Ok, applied to the netmap github repo. >> >> >> >>>>>> This fix will be published when Luigi does the next commit on FreeBSD. >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> Cheers, >> >> >> >>>>>> Vincenzo >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> 2016-12-19 20:05 GMT+01:00 Navdeep Parhar : >> >> >> >>>>>>> IFNET_RLOCK will work, thanks. >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Navdeep >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Vincenzo Maffione wrote: >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Hi Navdeep, >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Indeed, we have reviewed the code, and we think it is ok to >> >> >> >>>>>>>> implement nm_os_ifnet_lock() with IFNET_RLOCK(), instead of using >> >> >> >>>>>>>> IFNET_WLOCK(). >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Since IFNET_RLOCK() results into sx_slock(), this should fix the issue. >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> On FreeBSD, this locking is needed to protect a flag read by nm_iszombie(). >> >> >> >>>>>>>> However, on Linux the same lock is also needed to protect the call to >> >> >> >>>>>>>> the nm_hw_register() callback, so we prefer to have an "unified" >> >> >> >>>>>>>> locking scheme, i.e. always calling nm_hw_register under the lock. >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Does this make sense to you? Would it be easy for you to make a quick >> >> >> >>>>>>>> test by replacing IFNET_WLOCK with IFNET_RLOCK? >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Vincenzo >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> 2016-12-17 23:28 GMT+01:00 Navdeep Parhar : >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Luigi, Vincenzo, >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> The last major update to netmap (r307394 and followups) broke cxgbe's >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> native netmap support. The problem is that netmap_hw_reg now holds an >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> rw_lock around the driver's netmap_on/off routines. It has always been >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> safe for the driver to sleep during these operations but now it panics >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> instead. >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Why is IFNET_WLOCK needed here? It seems like a regression to disallow >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> sleep on the control path. >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Navdeep >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> begin_synchronized_op with the following non-sleepable locks held: >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> exclusive rw ifnet_rw (ifnet_rw) r = 0 (0xffffffff8271d680) locked @ >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> /root/ws/head/sys/dev/netmap/netmap_freebsd.c:95 >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> stack backtrace: >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> #0 0xffffffff810837a5 at witness_debugger+0xe5 >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> #1 0xffffffff81084d88 at witness_warn+0x3b8 >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> #2 0xffffffff83ef2bcc at begin_synchronized_op+0x6c >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> #3 0xffffffff83f14beb at cxgbe_netmap_reg+0x5b >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> #4 0xffffffff809846f1 at netmap_hw_reg+0x81 >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> #5 0xffffffff809806de at netmap_do_regif+0x19e >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> #6 0xffffffff8098121d at netmap_ioctl+0x7ad >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> #7 0xffffffff8098682f at freebsd_netmap_ioctl+0x5f >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> -- >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Vincenzo Maffione >> >> >> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> >>>>>>>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> >> >> >>>>>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> >> >> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>> -- >> >> >> >>>>>> Vincenzo Maffione >> >> >> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> >>>>>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> >> >> >>>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> >> >> >>>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> -- >> >> >> >>>> Vincenzo Maffione >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> -- >> >> >> >>> -----------------------------------------+------------------------------- >> >> >> >>> Prof. Luigi RIZZO, rizzo@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione >> >> >> >>> http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ . Universita` di Pisa >> >> >> >>> TEL +39-050-2217533 . via Diotisalvi 2 >> >> >> >>> Mobile +39-338-6809875 . 56122 PISA (Italy) >> >> >> >>> -----------------------------------------+------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> Vincenzo Maffione >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > John Baldwin >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > John Baldwin >> >> >> >> > > > -- > John Baldwin -- Vincenzo Maffione