From owner-svn-src-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 24 08:29:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-projects@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A10E1065673; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 08:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lulf@freebsd.org) Received: from hylle02.itea.ntnu.no (hylle02.itea.ntnu.no [IPv6:2001:700:300:3::101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D02E8FC0A; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 08:29:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hylle02.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35EE56803C; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 10:29:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hylle02.itea.ntnu.no Received: from carrot.geeknest.org (lynx.stud.ntnu.no [IPv6:2001:700:300:3::180]) by hylle02.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B340B68029; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 10:29:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 10:33:04 +0200 From: Ulf Lilleengen To: Ulrich =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sp=F6rlein?= , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-projects@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100424083304.GA1764@carrot.geeknest.org> References: <201004231416.o3NEGBni022056@svn.freebsd.org> <20100424071202.GF92627@acme.spoerlein.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20100424071202.GF92627@acme.spoerlein.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: Re: svn commit: r207115 - projects/csup_wip X-BeenThere: svn-src-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the src " projects" tree" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 08:29:20 -0000 On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 09:12:02AM +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > On Fri, 23.04.2010 at 14:16:10 +0000, Ulf Lilleengen wrote: > > Author: lulf > > Date: Fri Apr 23 14:16:10 2010 > > New Revision: 207115 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/207115 > > > > Log: > > - Remove work in progress branch for csup, as it is in sync with head. > > > > Deleted: > > projects/csup_wip/ > > Hi Ulf, > > I wonder what should happen to the vendor/csup branches. As the project > has been collapsed into head/ and development is probably happening > there or in projects/ should we close/delete the vendor/csup branch? > Oh, we have a vendor branch for csup? I've never noticed :) > What's our policy on that? Also, what is going to happen with stuff like > vendor/bc or vendor/cpio once we no longer have them in any active > branch? > I have no idea if there is a policy for this. I would say it depends on whether or not it contains history. For instance, in subversion, there is direct mergeinfo from a merge from vendor/csup to head, because that happened before svn switch. And, if bc is removed from base, I would expect the vendor branch go away too (if I understood your proposal correctly). Anyway, I've never touched this, but I see mux@ did some changes after the svn switch. Ulf