From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jun 9 05:27:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84688B703F5 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 05:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x233.google.com (mail-it0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40C5412D5 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 05:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x233.google.com with SMTP id h190so26589396ith.1 for ; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 22:27:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=w1AAtq2Kop/yPfw3/86ZrHmk4RSf1diIqzQZ5230p9A=; b=zdy4VQdzWYGmdfwdYv49iUuKQhI5kwb/s0ybSG3WetA92mROEl6uKAtptR8UsuN4lE JYav02/1A8Gay3BSMisdGwshSmd5UkxTtQU6f0MUw+RP/Nu0Sy/k+s/LM8ONWpBzUeAE o43G5ikO1BRB9YnE1ajGjCvWVWc9nT5EYr6Mj07Vewv0R+Gue+7yPHBDeyx8u6q4Tn0h oVe7w99GV/WUOprNJC8bwpOvFWJgiWtbMxodtFaNv1pVA7dS6/wCq/G0KOF8WeQMu1Cv u8KzNVXXtyxArcUU+eF0cIsc4mu7l7+Lx/TTzl2qRdTT9OEzOGVX85R4PfM4MhF5TLsa bvyw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=w1AAtq2Kop/yPfw3/86ZrHmk4RSf1diIqzQZ5230p9A=; b=X0LxPDZfQdAuMcBAP5OLouNtRhBuUnhwGsS54fGowmH/LI/V7BJbL7+Rh/s6BXEI2p 5qfIeJ/FFLO5zSkbYaKGBuLudp1u/pUJ3OteSXewxMhoxgKtmtCKj6hGzUF+D6cNg1Nb rUY3M5i74yHw6wByyP/wH4FWlkq/LkO8wrQzaiyDGUXbPhOlnlE4qFpdKtM2m/S9tKbS RcNL4AI8B9O3F1ehMaM0xHiHPcjCuzD3fXQ/VkhX8HuuIVwvFm8q8su2NyfipjFaQNak /8Fdpg+TQhlqpYjI0JIike4x1GtE08+KD/jHgDqENW6E7v4F3mvV4F94sPJRFbPyBfDr 2qbg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIRtLrKy0aih+qk0t2VdEUi+0M/piBEwHCmM0n9RHZYUvl+kWKPJqsx7XCNv1VZZQ0msUt1ClE5ksm1lQ== X-Received: by 10.36.89.4 with SMTP id p4mr13840457itb.44.1465450047800; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 22:27:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.79.20.70 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 22:27:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160608231922.GR28804@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <20160608231922.GR28804@albert.catwhisker.org> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 22:27:27 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: z2Kb9q7BPTwrXeRgzuK4z7ThNvA Message-ID: Subject: Re: Download all source before compiling the port To: FreeBSD Ports ML Cc: Rafael Rodrigues Nakano Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 05:27:28 -0000 On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 4:19 PM, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 08:15:04PM -0300, Rafael Rodrigues Nakano wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Is there a way to download everything required by a port before starting > to > > build it and its dependencies (so I can let it to build later without an > > internet connection). Thanks in advance. > > .... > > I have been using (and still use) "portmaster" to update > locally-inistalled ports on a couple machines (one of which is my > laptop). > > Quite some time ago, I started running "portmaster -aF" specificially > for this purpose (while rebuilding base FreeBSD), prior to a subsequent > "portmaster -ad" (after the reboot). > > Caveat: portmaster is ... rather deprecated of late. See ports@ > archives for further discussion on that topic. (in fact, Ii'll redirect > this to ports@, as it's a ports issue.) > > Peace, > david > -- > David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org > Those who would murder in the name of God or prophet are blasphemous > cowards. > > See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. > I am not aware of its deprecation. It now has a maintainer and has worked flawlessly for me (as I assume, it has for you). It is clear that some people world like to see it deprecated, but it is still widely used and I see no reason to change as long as it continues to be supported. Things it does, like -aF, make it seem the better choice. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683