From owner-freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 17 20:15:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58171065673 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:15:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [194.62.233.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DEBC8FC17 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:15:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from sp34.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.107] helo=bs1.sp34.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1K8hav-000IoZ-22; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:15:57 +0400 Received: from bsam by bs1.sp34.ru with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1K8hbX-0006eZ-Lb; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:16:35 +0400 To: Hugo Meiland References: <62956155@bs1.sp34.ru> <485811F9.5030401@chem.leidenuniv.nl> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:16:35 +0400 In-Reply-To: <485811F9.5030401@chem.leidenuniv.nl> (Hugo Meiland's message of "Tue\, 17 Jun 2008 21\:35\:21 +0200") Message-ID: <96873100@bs1.sp34.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: net/openafs-server and/or kernel module (7.0-STABLE-i386) X-BeenThere: freebsd-afs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: The Andrew File System and FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:15:58 -0000 On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:35:21 +0200 Hugo Meiland wrote: > > So the question is: should a kernel module from net/arla (or something > > else) be used? > normally you would like to have a client running on the system from > which you want to control the server; thus have a arla client running > on the server if you are building a single system setup.... It shouldn't be a single system (if it fits our needs). But this system is just a first one to experiment with. > another option is to control the server from a different machine with > only the client software (often the arla client and some utils from > the openafs-server package, since they have implemented all options to > actually control the server); this last option is not very easy to set > up if you do not have at least one server up-and-running.... Seems that I understand the case. > Hope this helpes... Sure, thanks! WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve