From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 26 03:28:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC9816A4CE for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 03:28:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3D343D39 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 03:28:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from heccjj@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id f1so228859rne for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:28:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:content-type:to:subject:from; b=ZNXu7AS0h7vRdLrmqWyUNn6xCxjqyDHcd8NeQ8DNS44BPE0GDSslnN8b+NVrSexi9Adti77kQxUde/TuRFbQYRXKPTLU4BD0XqjM3r+jy8TCVkvOP4qXLU3uzRU4j5Wd4GEdW0RyWi4xH8T2JCoe/QLLbjRAYyRcoX9NpOwJITo= Received: by 10.38.149.2 with SMTP id w2mr262010rnd; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:28:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.123.104? ([211.161.123.40]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTP id 79sm4072rna.2005.01.25.19.28.22; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:28:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <41F70E54.8060403@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:28:20 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: zh-cn,zh Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 To: freebsd-questions From: heccj Subject: My FreeBSD Box's WEB serve sleeps? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 03:28:26 -0000 My FreeBSD 5.3 Box have Apache MySQL and pureftp serve,and i start them by adding *****_enable="YES" in the /etc/rc.conf. I meet an odd problem: if the clients visit http serve via internet at the first time after a long time(eg. one day),my box will delays for about serveral minutes,and then it works very well. But another box at the same situation that run with Windows server 's IIS has not this problem. thanks!