Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 5 Mar 1996 00:49:43 -0800 (PST)
From:      asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
To:        thomas@ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de
Cc:        adam@veda.is, chuckr@Glue.umd.edu, thomas@ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: doc directory
Message-ID:  <199603050849.AAA11136@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <199603041057.LAA15994@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> (thomas@ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de)

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
 * I think we also proposed a new variable in /etc/make.conf,
 * something like ${NOPORTDOCS). Porters could then conditionalize the
 * installation of additional docs by
 * 
 * .if !defined(NOPORTDOCS)
 * 	<rules>
 * .endif
 * 
 * similar to ${NOMANCOMPRESS}. The default should be off, that is,
 * undefined.

Um, we can do that too, but is this really necessary?  I just don't
see the need of putting this in just to save a little bit of space.

Unless we are advocating putting 100K ps files and such in the ports
doc dir....

Satoshi



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603050849.AAA11136>