From owner-freebsd-haskell@freebsd.org Sun Jul 14 20:32:56 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-haskell@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28022A5860 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 20:32:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6BF8B529 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 20:32:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0AFFAA585F; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 20:32:56 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: haskell@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC08A585E for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 20:32:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDAA18B528 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 20:32:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DDB8AE44 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 20:32:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x6EKWt5h010435 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 20:32:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x6EKWtCb010434 for haskell@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 20:32:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: haskell@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 236805] [NEW PORT] lang/elm: Delightful language for reliable webapps Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 20:32:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: contact@evilham.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: haskell@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: DDAA18B528 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.98 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.982,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:2610:1c1:1::/48, country:US]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-haskell@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Haskell issues and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 20:32:56 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236805 --- Comment #11 from Evilham --- (In reply to Gleb Popov from comment #10) Indeed it works without EXECUTABLES as well, it was a left over from having named the port elm-lang at first. I probably should have mentioned that I built the elm-lang.org website with= the binary package that was produced on poudriere as well as other sources and = it worked just fine. Meanwhile I was taking a look at elm-0.18, it looks like that was a bit of a mess with multiple binaries from multiple repositories and an awkward build chain, so it may not be worth the time investment right now. arrowd mentioned that switching in the future to a master port / slave ports for the different versions wouldn't be too problematic, so maybe it'd be OK= if we left lang/elm as the one and only elm port until a new version is releas= ed (which apparently can take anything from some months to some years) or some= one (could be future me in some months) does the work to get 0.18 to compile properly. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=