Date: Sun, 23 Mar 1997 11:37:09 +0200 (EET) From: mika ruohotie <bsdcur@shadows.aeon.net> To: langfod@dihelix.com (David Langford) Cc: mpp@freefall.freebsd.org, langfod@dihelix.com, tom@uniserve.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ahc crashes Message-ID: <199703230937.LAA07062@shadows.aeon.net> In-Reply-To: <199703211909.JAA03106@caliban.dihelix.com> from David Langford at "Mar 21, 97 09:09:54 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> and widely variing of the OS. I have noticed in the past that LINT > seemed to about the only place that "undocumented" options were documented. > It is unclear when "undocumented" options become more than just testbed stuff. > I certainly dont expect current's LINT to be up-to-date but > perhaps in the RELEASES or such. to clarify my comments on this subject, that was what i meant too, i know it's not "fair" to expect LINT on current being anywhere near up to date, but i think releases are slightly different case... random user who picks up the cdrom (ok, so i'm not one :p) has no idea where to even look for kernel options if they are not quite familiar with the system itself... or if they're not reading mailinglists... even i was under impression 2.1.x didnt carry those AHC options, and my mistake was not to make full search... and reason why i'm not contributing myself is that i lack the skills... =( mickey
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703230937.LAA07062>